Some stray thoughts…
I have two things to talk about today.
The first concerns my last few blog entries … the blog entries I wrote about the American Election.
I really want to hammer home the understanding that I respect people’s rights to their opinion, so long as that opinion doesn’t involve the need of causing harm to other people or the world in general. However, I want others to extend the same courtesy not only to me, but everyone as well.
When I speak of the Autobot-vs.-Decepticons mentality of the GOP, I don’t expect Republican voters to agree with me. I would like it if they don’t expect me to share their views in return.
If we all had to feel the same, think the same and vote the same, we would be living in North Korea.
And this isn’t about Democrats or Republicans because truth be told, I think both those parties are way, WAY too right wing for me on most issues, although I do agree with the democrats on MORE issues than the Republicans (No-brainer-alert).
It’s not even about the myriad of tiny political parties in the United States that never see a chance of actual representation, be it the Green Peace party, the Libertarians, the Communist Workers of America … or whatever.
I reserve the right to think and feel the way I do, just as I think others have the same right in return.
Because of that, I am deeply saddened when I do end up in heated arguments over political views. On my forum, I have some rules about politics and, in particular, religion. Both can be discussed and debated there … I’m not a tyrant and I’m not a political censor’s pen … but I want any such debates to happen in a mature and calm way. I want people to extend that respect I spoke of above to each other, and I want people to understand that it is actually an integral, necessary part of any working republican or even democratic system (and I am not talking about the political parties here, but the basic political systems) to have differences of opinion. Otherwise, we’re talking a dictatorship and very few people want to live under that.
Hence, I am ashamed of myself that I actually got so riled lately, that I allowed myself to get into what was rapidly degenerating into a mudslinging contest … right there, on my own damned forum. Shame on me for not having caught it earlier. Shame on me for not stopping myself, for not backing up and saying ‘okay, this is a bad idea’ two posts earlier.
I should have.
Certain political and/or religious topics are supercharged. They are dry powder kegs, standing in the middle of a Californian forest-fire. They’re the equivalent of playing hackeysack with a bottle of nitroglycerine. I know these this to be the case, and yet I got yanked into such a debate anyway. I’m sorry for it, to any of you who read what went on. I will try harder to avoid that in the future. I can’t promise I’ll always succeed but I can promise I’ll try.
Bottom note, and I will let that be the last thing I say in this round of comments about the presidential election of November 4th, 2008, is that I don’t think the right man won. But that was not because I wanted the other guy to win.
I don’t think the right man … or woman … ran.
So of the lesser of two evils, I supported the man I believe stands closer to my opinions on issues central to my being and close to my heart, and I will vehemently defend this step to the world. I didn’t vote … I am not an American citizen, so I couldn’t … but if I had been able to, I would have voted for Barack Obama. I would have voted FOR his policies on a small number of issues, such as healthcare … and I would have voted AGAINST John McCain and particularly Sarah Palin because of a large number of issues such as education, healthcare, abortion, gay rights and so on.
I would not have voted for anyone becuase I agreed with them to a great extent, because a politician I agree with would likely be shot in a matter of moments in a country like the United States which combines almost rabid anti-socialist sentiment with the right of any Tom, Dick and Harry to buy military grade hardware and store them in his living room.
As with all elections, we will now get to see whether the candidate who won is going to make good on the promises, and sadly, they rarely do.
That was the first issue.
The second is a man named Keith Olbermann.
Keith Olbermann is a prominent television personality on the American network station NBC. I don’t expect non-Americans to know who he is, and for all I know there may be some of my American readers who are willing to swear on a mountain of assorted holy scripture that he’s evil incarnated.
To me, he’s a hero.
Why?
I’ll tell you why.
Keith Olbermann uses humor. In fact, I have watched a large number of snippets of his broadcasts and a few longer segments, and he pretty much embodies the paraphrased expression ‘no-one is sacrosanct’. He’ll crack a joke about just anyone. He’ll humiliate crooked politicians and self-serving religious nutcases no matter who they are, from Osama bin Laden to George W. Bush (just to take two extremes of the spectrum).
In fact, I haven’t seen him get serious on more than a couple of occasions, because apparently, he subscribes to the ideal that if you can get people to laugh with you, you can make them listen to you. Smart man, if you ask me.
So when I found a snippet this morning, on a blog I read every time it’s updated, called ‘Special comment on gay marriage’ (look it up on youtube, everyone…’special comment on gay marriage – keith olbermann’) I was completely gobsmacked to see this exuberant, extrovert personality sitting there, with a voice so thick with tears it sounds like he’s about to break down any moment, lambasting … HAMMERING … those who voted for Proposition 8 in one of the most personal, furious assaults on viewers in recent television history … I wanted to hug the man.
I wanted to give him a civic award medal or something along those lines. I don’t know what the appropriate action would be, but I know I wanted to let him know how much it meant to me to see that.
Normally, I would sit back and say ‘Oh, but he’s never going to reach any of the people who actually DID vote yes on Prop 8, because they won’t watch his show. NBC is too liberal a channel for such people to watch it’, but in this case it’s not the case. California voted for Obama. It is ALLEGEDLY the biggets bastion and stronghold for the Democrats in the United States (not really the case, since they elected Ah’nuld as governor, but whatever), and it is famed all over the world for its free spirits. Since so many people voted for Obama in that particular state, yet voted for Prop 8, there is a good chance that many of the people voting in favor of that accursed piece of legislation consider themselves liberals and would watch NBC.
Ergo, there is a reasonable chance that Keith Olbermann actually reached some of the people who voted in favor of Proposition 8, and there is a good chance they had to actually watch while their skewed, self-righteous ‘morality’ was hung, drawn and quartered on national television. They had to sit there and watch while he attacked them personally, as egotistical, unintelligent and completely unaware of their own history.
One particular point he made (and I really do urge you all to go look up that piece on Youtube … it is remarkable television) … was that until 1967, 16 states in the United States of America had laws forbidding blacks and whites from marrying. If we go further back, blacks couldn’t even marry other blacks, because they were property. Their marriage vows didn’t say ‘until death do you part’…but until ‘death or distance do you part’. Their marriages were not legally binding. They were not granted protection of the law for their relationship, and this … most importantly … was considered absolutely right and true by white people.
If people hadn’t REDEFINED MARRIAGE back then, such marriages would still be illegal. If people hadn’t stood up and said ‘of course black men and women should have the right to marry whoever they fall in love with’, we would still be living in a corner of Ku Klux Klan paradise. If people hadn’t stopped their racial NONSENSE back then, black marriages would still be considered IMMORAL.
In 1935, Hermann G??ring stood on the podium in Nuremburg and REDEFINED MARRIAGE, by bombastically proclaiming the laws for the protection of German honor and German blood. This included a ban on all marriages involving jews. It did, in fact, mean that marriages between Jews and non-Jews were abolished by law. After all, such marriages were IMMORAL, and consequently, all such marriages across Germany were declared null and void, and from one day to the next, thousands of people found themselves divorced by law, whether they still loved each other or not.
But it is okay to do the same thing to 18.000 gay men and lesbians in California in 2008, isn’t it?
Because not doing so would mean REDEFINING MARRIAGE…
Because their love is IMMORAL…
Go watch Keith Obermann, people … and then think long and hard. Whether you support gay marriage or not … think long and hard.
Thank you for reading.